Blog/News: Debunking My Haters – The Truth of the Israel/Palestine War. Part 3: Antisemitism and the War.

This is another series that I started and haven’t made any posts about in a while. The last one I did was in November and with the holiday season coming quickly, I decided to take a break to focus on some more positive things. However, as I have gotten even more ridiculous comments from the Pro-Palestine people, I have decided to address one of the most ridiculous claims that I have ever seen. This comment was from an anonymous commentor who said:

Israeli propoganda at its finest. Keep being the genocidal freak that you are. This genocide has NOTHING to do with anti-semitism.

Then someone else commented with the hilariously apt name of usuallysheep, agreeing with the original commentor:

perfect summary of the general sentiment in this comments section 

the author of this article is impressive…ly ignorant.

How is it even physically possible for every single thing u type to be blatantly untrue 

like, a blind person doing a true or false quiz would have better accuracy results tbh

Going on a slight tangent here, how is it even possible for these people to make so many grammatical errors in these few sentences? Did these people never learn grammar in elementary school or are they just so blinded by their anger that any grammatical knowledge they did have went flying out of the window? I can understand an error here and there (even I make those; no one has perfect grammar) but the lack of punctuation and capitalization makes me wonder if this is a problem with them, their teachers, or if phones are really making us that dumb.

Anyways….

This comment is stupid on two levels. First, is the fact that whoever the original commentor is thinks that I’m spreading Israeli propaganda. I’m not. I’m spreading easily verifiable facts backed with my sources. Secondly, the idea that this war isn’t based on antisemitism is completely and totally wrong and is easily fact checked if you care to read Hamas’ charter, which I did and it is in the fourth paragraph that you get their mission statement, which says this:

“Israel will rise and will remain erect until Islam eliminates it as it had eliminated its predecessors.” The Imam and Martyr Hassan al-Banna(5) May Allah Pity his Soul (Hassan al-Banna — the MB founder was assassinated in 1949 by an Egyptian’s government agent as a retaliation to the assassination of the Egyptian PM in these days)”
“The Islamic World is burning. It is incumbent upon each one of us to pour some water, little as it may be, with a view of extinguishing as much of the fire as he can, without awaiting action by the others.” Sheikh Amjad Al-zahawi May Allah
Pity his Soul.
In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate
Just a reminder, this was the fourth through the sixth paragraph. It’s on the front page and you can find this with a quick search on Google or Bing. This isn’t some super-hidden conspiracy. Hamas is open and proud of their genocidal desire to wipe Israel from the face of the planet.

Isn’t Islam such a peaceful religion. Truly, Allah is soo merciful.

Even more condemning are paragraphs 10-12:

When the thought matured, the seed grew and the plant took root in the land of reality, detached from temporary emotion and unwelcome haste, the Islamic Resistance Movement erupted in order to play its role in the path of its Lord. In so
doing, it joined its hands with those of all Jihad(7) fighters for the purpose of liberating Palestine. The souls of its Jihad fighters will encounter those of all Jihad fighters who have sacrificed their lives in the land of Palestine since it was
conquered a3) by the Companion(9) of the Prophet, be Allah’s prayer and peace upon him, and until this very day. This is the Charter of the Islamic Resistance (Hamas) which will reveal its face, unveil its identity, state its position, clarify its
purpose, discuss its hopes, call for support to its cause and reinforcement, and for joining its ranks. For our struggle against the Jews is extremely wide-ranging and grave, so much so that it will need all the loyal efforts we can wield, to be followed by further steps and reinforced by successive battalions from the multifarious Arab: and Islamic world, until the enemies are defeated and Allah’s victory prevails. Thus we shall perceive them approaching in the horizon, and this will be known before long:
“Allah has decreed: Lo! I very shall conquer, I and my messengers, lo! Allah is strong, almighty.” Sura 58 (Al-Mujadilah), verse 21(10).
“!Say: This is my way: I. call on Allah with sure knowledge, I and whosoever follows me. Glory be to Allah! and I am not of the idolaters.” Sura 12 (Yussuf), verse 17 (108 in Pickthall).

As if that wasn’t bad enough, we get even more to condemn them in the following articles of their charter. Paragraph 7 of Article 7, is extremely antisemitic, saying:

The time(16) will not come [the time referred to is Judgement Day] until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: 0 Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him! This will not apply to the Gharqad [a type of tree](17), which is a Jewish tree (cited by Bukhari and Muslim)(18).

Article 17 (which is about the role of Muslim women in the Jihad) says this of Zionists (which they use as interchangeable with Jew):

Those Zionist organizations [“the Free Masons, Rotary Clubs, gangs of spies and the like”] control vast material resources, which enable them to fulfill their mission amidst societies, with a view of implementing Zionist goals and sowing the concepts that can be of use to the enemy. Those organizations operate [in a situation] where Islam is absent from the arena and alienated from its people. Thus, the Muslims must fulfill their duty in confronting the schemes of those saboteurs. When Islam will retake possession of [the means to] guide the life [of the world], it will wipe out those
organizations which are the enemy of humanity and Islam. Fits the Global Islam Revolution ideology Offer B)

Article 22 shares the same sentiment:

The enemies have been scheming for a long time, and they have consolidated their schemes, in order to achieve what they have achieved. They took advantage of key-elements in unfolding events, and accumulated a huge and influential material
wealth which they put to the service of implementing their dream. This wealth [permitted them to] take over control of the world media such as news agencies, the press, publication houses, broadcasting and the like. [They also used this]
wealth to stir revolutions in various parts of the globe in order to fulfill their interests and pick the fruits. They stood behind the French and the Communist Revolutions and behind most of the revolutions we hear about here and there. They also used the money to establish clandestine organizations which are spreading around the world, in order to destroy societies and carry out Zionist interests. Such organizations are: the Free Masons, Rotary Clubs, Lions Clubs, B’nai B’rith and the like. All of them are destructive spying organizations. They also used the money to take over control of the Imperialist states and made them colonize many countries in order to exploit the wealth of those countries and spread their corruption therein.

As regards local and world wars, it has come to pass and no one objects, that they stood behind World War 1, so as to wipe out the Islamic Caliphate (50). They collected material gains and took control of many sources of wealth. They obtained
the Balfour Declaration (51) and established the League of Nations in order to rule the world by means of that organization. They also stood behind World War II, where they
[anyone of Jewish descent] collected immense benefits from trading with war materials, and prepared for the establishment of their state. They inspired the establishment of the United Nations and the Security Council to replace the League of Nations, in order to rule the world by their intermediary. There was no war that broke out anywhere without their fingerprints on it.

However, it’s Article 28 that’s the most egregious and most blatant in its wish to completely eliminate the Jews and screams the not-so-quiet part out loud for everyone to hear:

The Zionist invasion is a mischievous one. It does not hesitate to take any road, or to pursue all despicable and repulsive means to fulfill its desires. It relies to a great extent, for its meddling and spying activities, on the clandestine organizations which it has established, such as the Free Masons, Rotary Clubs, Lions, and other spying associations. All those secret organizations, some which are overt, act for the interests of Zionism and under its directions, strive to demolish societies, to destroy values, to wreck answerableness (58), to totter virtues and to wipe out Islam. It stands behind the diffusion of drugs and toxics of all kinds in order to facilitate its control and expansion. The Arab states surrounding Israel are required to open their borders to the Jihad fighters, the sons of the Arab and Islamic peoples, to enable them to play their role and to join their efforts to those of their brothers among the Muslim Brothers in Palestine.

The other Arab and Islamic states are required, at the very least, to facilitate the movement of the Jihad fighters from and to them. We cannot fail to remind every Muslim that when the Jews occupied Holy Jerusalem in 1967 and stood at the
doorstep of the Blessed al Aqsa Mosque, they shouted with joy:

“Muhammed is dead, he left daughters. behind.”(59)
Israel, by virtue of its being Jewish and of having a Jewish population, defies Islam and the Muslims.

If this reminds you of the antisemitic lies that Hitler spread about the Jews being the source of all problems Germany (and the rest of Europe) was facing in the 1930s and 40s, it should, especially since the Palestinians were buddy-buddy with Hitler in WWII. It’s the same evil on repeat. And ironically, Hamas calls the Jews the Nazis in their charter. Just read some of these excerpts from Hitler’s Mein Kampf and compare them to Article 28 and the other articles cited here. Here’s just one excerpt to use as an example:

His [the Jew’s] unfailing instinct in such things scents the original soul (die urspruengliche Seele) in everyone, and his hostility is assured to anyone who is not spirit of his spirit. Since the Jew is not the attacked but the attacker, not only anyone who attacks passes as his enemy, but also anyone who resists him. But the means with which he seeks to break such reckless but upright souls is not honest warfare, but lies and slander.

Here he stops at nothing, and in his vileness he becomes so gigantic that no one need be surprised if among our people the personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.

The ignorance of the broad masses about the inner nature of the Jew, the lack of instinct and narrow-mindedness of our upper classes, make the people an easy victim for this Jewish campaign of lies.

While from innate cowardice the upper classes turn away from a man whom the Jew attacks with lies and slander, the broad masses from stupidity or simplicity believe everything. The state authorities either cloak themselves in silence or, what usually happens, in order to put an end to the Jewish press campaign, they persecute the unjustly attacked, which, in the eyes of such an official ass, passes as the preservation of state authority and the safeguarding of law and order.

Slowly fear and the Marxist weapon of Jewry descend like a nightmare on the mind and soul of decent people.

They begin to tremble before the terrible enemy and thus have become his final victim.

The Jew’s domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.

It is a sign of their rising confidence and sense of security that at a time when one section is still playing the German, Frenchman, or Englishman, the other with open effrontery comes out as the Jewish race.

How close they see approaching victory can be seen by the hideous aspect which their relations with the members of other peoples takes on.

With satanic joy in his face, the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people. With every means he tries to destroy the racial foundations of the people he has set out to subjugate. Just as he himself systematically ruins women and girls, he does not shrink back from pulling down the blood barriers for others, even on a large scale. It was and it is Jews who bring the Negroes into the Rhineland, always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated white race by the necessarily resulting bastardization, throwing it down from its cultural and political height, and himself rising to be its master.

For a racially pure people which is conscious of its blood can never be enslaved by the Jew. In this world he will forever be master over bastards and bastards alone.

And so he tries systematically to lower the racial level by a continuous poisoning of individuals.

And in politics he begins to replace the idea of democracy by the dictatorship of the proletariat.

In the organized mass of Marxism he has found the weapon which lets him dispense with democracy and in its stead allows him to subjugate and govern the peoples with a dictatorial and brutal fist.

He works systematically for revolutionization in a twofold sense: economic and political.

Around peoples who offer too violent a resistance to attack from within he weaves a net of enemies, thanks to his international influence, incites them to war, and finally, if necessary, plants a flag of revolution on the very battlefields.

In economics he undermines the states until the social enterprises which have become unprofitable are taken from the state and subjected to his financial control.

In the political field he refuses the state the means for its self-preservation, destroys the foundations of all national self-maintenance and defense, destroys faith in the leadership, scoffs at its history and past, and drags everything that is truly great into the gutter.

Culturally, he contaminates art, literature, the theater, makes a mockery of natural feeling, overthrows all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drags men down into the sphere of his own base nature.

Religion is ridiculed, ethics and morality represented as outmoded, until the last props of a nation in its struggle for existence in this world have fallen.

Now begins the great last revolution. In gaining political power the Jew casts off the few cloaks that he still wears. The democratic people’s Jew becomes the blood-Jew and tyrant over peoples. In a few years he tries to exterminate the national intelligentsia and by robbing the peoples of their natural intellectual leadership makes them ripe for the slave’s lot of permanent subjugation.

The most frightful example of this kind is offered by Russia, where he killed or starved about thirty million people with positively fanatical savagery, in part amid inhuman tortures, in order to give a gang of Jewish journalists and stock exchange bandits domination over a great people.

The end is not only the end of the freedom of the peoples oppressed by the Jew, but also the end of this parasite upon the nations. After the death of his victim, the vampire sooner or later dies too.

The only difference here is that Hamas’ charter seems to be pro-Marxist. Other than that, these excerpts share the same sentiment.

(And by the way, for all of you Queers for Palestine, feminists, etc. who support Hamas, this stuff applies to you as well. You constantly defy the Qur’an as well in your beliefs, your dress, and your sexuality, so guess who would also be on Hamas’ hit list.)

So…do you still want to claim that this war has nothing to do with antisemitism? Do you still want to claim that I’m ignorant? Do you still want to claim that Hamas are the good guys?

On the bright side, either way, these people will lose. Already, 33 more hostages have been liberated and with Trump as president, I wouldn’t if Hamas becomes a distant memory by the end of the year.

Until next time,

M.J.

20 thoughts on “Blog/News: Debunking My Haters – The Truth of the Israel/Palestine War. Part 3: Antisemitism and the War.

Add yours

  1. First of all, i really don’t think hamas is the good guy

    second of all, hamas, not palestine

    third of all, this is what you mean by “buddy buddy”?

    Relations between Nazi Germany (1933–1945) and the Arab world ranged from indifference, fear, animosity, and confrontation[1][2] to collaboration.[3][4][5] In terms of confrontation, the Arab intellectual elite was very critical towards Nazism, which was perceived as a totalitarian, racist, antisemitic and imperialist phenomenon. It was criticized both by the liberals and by the Marxists and left-wing nationalists who denounced Nazism as another form of imperialism.[6] Nazi Germany used collaborators and propaganda throughout the Arab world in search of alliance for their political goals.[7][8] For some Arab and Muslim leaders the Nazi hostility towards the United Kingdom and France – which held colonies in the Arab World – offered an avenue of cooperation. This hostility was used in Nazi propaganda to allege an anti-colonial common interest that Nazi Germany held.[9] However this interest conflicted with interests of Nazi Germany’s allies who also had colonies in the Arab world, namely Spain, Vichy France and Italy, and thus had to manage competing interests in the region.

    and not to mention this “buddy-ness” was caused by colonization by France, Britain and others (all namely christian countries…hm). AND if you wanna talk about being buddy buddy did you forget italy???? Again a christian country. No hate to christians tho, i have christian friends. I’m just saying if you’re pointing out one, point out the others.

    Like

    1. While there were tensions between the two, Nazi Germany promised to help the Arabs get rid of British/French control and also helped spread propaganda against the Allies that demonized the West for being “Jewish-controled” (which was not true BTW), which aligned with anti-Semitic views held by the Arabs.
      As for your “Hamas, not Palestine” comment, at least 71% of Palestinians support Hamas’ attack on October 7th according to the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. And the Palestinians still support them to this day because Hamas has successfully radicalized an entire generation of people.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Discernment between Genocide and blood libel “genocide” Why Jews view the Xtian church as the worst Av Tuma Nazi like avoda zarah?

    The vision of Torah as an oath-based, constitutional brit alliance cut between the chosen Cohen people who alone accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, whose revelation centers upon judicial justice and prophetic mussar—not theological creeds or divine incarnations or false messiah Son of God theological creeds. Silly Xtian, even by the exceptionally low standards of your sophomoric bible translations Proverbs 1:33 says: “But whoso hearkeneth unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.” (KJV); this lone verse, its contained within the larger sugya of 1:20-2:22.

    Shlomo rebukes his son for refusal to pursue Oral Torah wisdom. His pursuit of foreign women – cultural adultery – a direct Torah curse which resulted in king Shlomo whore-shipping after church-like avoda zarah. Silly Xtian, even by the exceptionally low standards of your sophomoric bible translations Proverbs 1:33 says: “But whoso hearkeneth unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.” (KJV). You silly reactionary Goyim have no wisdom. Goyim, they remind me how water behaves on a hot skillet! Ya ball up, bounce around, and make noise.

    Yes its a really sorry condition to be born and raised ignorant – comparable to the incest children raised in the Appalachian Mountains – ignorant hillbillies from the Ozarks, to ignorant to admit that Xtianity sucks eggs. T’NaCH common law learns through precedents. Mishlei 1:33 functions as a precedent to Yesha’Yahu 32:17 contained within the larger sugya of 32:9-20. Pathetic Goyim don’t know that ya can’t uproot a verse out of its surrounding contexts without perverting it unto Nazi like propaganda! T’NaCH — a common law legal system. But you Appalachians don’t know this basic fact, because your church denies the existence of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. Truly sucks being as ignorant as sticks.

    Righteousness has nothing to do with theological Creed belief systems. The new-testament promotes JeZeus as the messiah Son of God – bull shit. Righteousness, all about fear of heaven – people who protect their good name reputations, like ideally as do Judges and lawyers, healers, and Sefer Torah scribes! But even affixing a “Gemarah” Holy Writing secondary source to a Prophet Primary source – not enough in משנה תורה common law – Oral Torah inductive reasoning.

    A scholar, with fear of heaven, learns that Prophet source, to some other Prophetic precedent, then back to the Book of D’varim, and ideally even back to the Book of בראשית, which introduces Av tohor time oriented commandments, which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna. Doing mitzvot observance with the k’vanna of prophetic mussar separates Av tohor time oriented commandments — from toldot secondary positive/negative commandments and Talmudic ritual halachot — all of which do not require k’vanna. However,,,, if a person weaves prophetic mussar as the weft thread of the warp threads of positive, negative, and Talmudic ritual halachah למעשה, this Torah wisdom elevates them all to Av tohor time oriented commandments from the Torah. This Av Torah commandment creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing in all generations Israel walks upon the face of the Earth.

    Torah law not some new testament bull shit, that promotes a dumb-ass axe to grind; which prostitutes T’NaCH verses to advertise new testament avoda zarah abominations; belief in av tumah other false messiahs, and nonsensical farcical Chili Pepper talking Gods on a stick.

    To understand this prophetic sugya 32:9-20 requires that a person learn this strong prophetic mussar rebuke in the context of the previous sugya 32:1-8. Through the wisdom of Oral Torah Pardes inductive logic reasoning, a close precedent which permits a person to read this same idea viewed from, a fresh and completely different perspective: 5:1-6 of the same prophet. Torah holds tremendous depths, like a diamond has tens of thousands of facet faces! The new testament Paul and JeZeus – pony show – Goebbels propaganda – narishkeit, declares that a T’NaCH verse only has one narrow meaning, which Xtian church authorities dictate, comparable to how, only the Government can print money!

    T’NaCH mussar spins around the central axis of judicial justice – NOT belief in JeZeus the messiah Son of God new testament abomination. The opening verse of Parashat שופטים testifies to this emphasized priority of Torah faith. The sugya of D’varim 24:14,15 initiates the command of this strong prophetic mussar. When the 3 Melachim visited Avraham after he did the mitzva of brit melah – they visited a “righteous” man who obeys Torah commandments. HaShem blessed Avraham in everything – because he lived a righteous life – he obeyed Torah commandments.

    Oppression caused the sons of Yaacov to descend unto g’lut/exile in pursuit of Yosef. The wicked do not call upon HaShem. The Avot by stark contrast, called upon El Shaddai as their God. On Chag Sukkot the soul name, dedicated to that regel – Yom Tov – the Nefesh Yechida/El Shaddai. Every 5th day of the week kabbalah instructs that a bnai brit man, to call from the depths of his heart, the remembrance of the El Shaddai nefesh Yechida-soul dedicated on the regel of Sukkot. The Divine Oral Torah tohor spirits live within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people who remember the oaths, by which the Avot swore an oath alliance with HaShem.

    HaShem made Moshe a “lord like messiah” to Par’o. Moshe judged the Gods worshipped by Par’o and the Egyptians, as JeZeus-like other false messiah-Gods. Chag Pesach remembers that HaShem judged the Gods worshipped by the Egyptians as false messiah-Gods. The mitzva to remember to expunge the assimilated and intermarried ערב רב Jews; whose fundamental lack fear of heaven – their ערב רב Av tuma avoda zarah, the root cause of all Amalek-antisemitism throughout the generations.

    This Torah curse, comes through Jews pursuing their life interests without remembering the oaths the Avot swore; just as did the sons of Yaacov after they sold Yosef into Egyptian slavery-as they married Canaanite women.

    The tohor time oriented commandments, which create the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations, as a living תמיד מעשה בראשית, when ever Israel does Av tohor time oriented commandments — with prophetic mussar as their k’vanna — the sons of Yaacov totally forgot and abandoned, to honor the oaths sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Unlike Yaacov, Yosef never gave מחילה to his siblings – he forgot the oath Yaacov swore to Yitzak when the latter caused the former to inherit the oath sworn Cohen people first-born faith.

    The ultimate בנין אב-precedent, the Parshah of תרומה! Only a fool could read this Parshah through the silly moronic eyes of טיפש פשט, like Xtian fundamentalists read the Creation stories. This Parshah employs the vessels of the Mishkan merely as a משל. Oral Torah פרדס logic demands that the bnai brit reader, regardless of the generation they live, make the required דיוק-logical inference- and grasp the נמשל prophetic mussar which instructs the brit oath-faith, that Israel pursues righteous judicial justice from generation to generation to generation. We dedicate the Mishkan to establish the lateral Sanhedrin Federal common law court system; within the national borders of the Torah Constitutional Republic of 12 Tribes.

    This critique does not limit itself to the new testament avoda zara abomination alone. It articulates a foundational critique of over 800 years of Jewish legal evolution. A halakhic manifesto in the tradition of the Baalei HaTosafot. A call to revive Torah as a political constitution, not a religion.

    The Sanhedrin as a judicial-political institution bound by territory and sovereignty—not a metaphysical Greek-oracle of divine truth. It seeks to reconstruct halakha as a national constitutional common law court system, not some Xtian narishkeit concerning a universal statute code, religious theocracy! A return to brit logic grounded in פרדס as explained by rabbi Akiva and Yishmael’s 13 middot of rabbinic logic commentary to פרדס inductive reasoning of precedent based common law. The latter serves as a commentary to the inductive 4-part reasoning of rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of the Oral Torah revealed to Moshe at Horev.

    By the time of the Vilna Gaon, the Rambam was halakhically canonized—not because his system triumphed on merit, but because generations downstream had long been cut off from the full Oral Torah structure of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic. This disgrace fulfills the curse of Isaiah 5:20 — “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness”.

    Rambam produced a foreign legal ontology which treats halakha as a rational system accessible to universal reason—not as a oath-brit, tribal alliance logic system. He ignored the פרדס structure: Pshat, Remez, Drash, Sod as integrated in Rabbi Akiva’s brit-based hermeneutics. He replaced it with Aristotelian syllogism methodology; based on Greek formal logic divorced from brit, drosh, prophetic context, or halakhic dialectics. He therefore consequently abandoned and neglected Rabbi Yishmael’s 13 Middot; not mere interpretive tools but a national logic of Torah jurisprudence rooted in the brit at Sinai.

    The Paris burnings (1242), a direct result of this fight: the Rambamists opened a door for Church scrutiny by introducing Greek metaphysics into Torah interpretation—thereby violating the Second Commandment (lo yihiyeh lecha elohim acheirim). Rabbeinu Yonah, (His “Teshuva” came after the Paris burnings disaster.), signed a cherem against the Rambam’s philosophical works, based on foreign assimilation concerns. In 1232 the Baali Tosafot in Paris likewise imposed the ban of נידוי upon the Rambam. These great rabbinic leaders condemned the Rambam’s Greco-Arabic statute-law codex, built on deductive logic and Aristotelian categories.

    So while this paper bitterly mocks Xtianity, Israel stands for its life fighting a war in Gaza. A lot of countries slander Israel with condemnations of “Genocide”, not limited only to South Africa’s blood libel slander! Mockery of the Church not just tactical, but rather it strives to make a theological dismantling, revealing how universalist Xtianity—and by extension, Islam—erases the brit by claiming a “spiritual Israel” and promoting replacement theology; starting with the Arafat propaganda which depicts post ’64 Palestinians as the heirs of the ancient Canaanites. Many nations in the UN today accuse Israel of genocide at The Hague … theological war and the legal war merge.

    Hence this post does not merely mock the Church—it delegitimizes its metaphysical foundation as a paganized distortion of Torah. It denounces the בראשית story of Yechuda taking a Canaanite wife, after selling Yosef unto Egyptian slavery. Jewish assimilation and intermarriage have brought the Jewish people to the brink of Civil War. Kapo Jews side with the post Oct 7th Palestinians and scream: “Not In Our Name!” Yosef failed to bless his brothers as did both Yaacov and Moshe. Giving מחילה to our people never more complex and difficult during the current war-time crisis.

    Herein includes a Chat AI interpretation of this text:

    ChatGPT said:

    This extended critique powerfully expresses a deep-rooted perspective within certain strands of Jewish thought that view Christianity not merely as a theological error, but as a profound betrayal of the covenantal, legal, and prophetic foundations of the Torah. You’re articulating a position that can be broken down into several core theses:

    Christianity as the Ultimate Avodah Zarah (Idolatry)
    You argue that the Church’s doctrines—such as the divinity of Jesus, the “Son of God” dogma, vicarious atonement, and scriptural supersessionism—are not only mistaken but constitute a form of Avodah Zarah (foreign worship) on par with, or even worse than, classical paganism. From a Torah-brit perspective, you frame the New Testament’s core claims as an inversion of everything the Sinai revelation taught:

    No divine incarnation: God is echad, not a man.

    No theological salvation: Righteousness stems from justice (mishpat) and ethical integrity (mussar), not faith in messianic figures.

    No replacement of Israel: The Torah was given exclusively to Am Yisrael; the brit is tribal, national, and eternal.

    Thus, Christianity—especially its ecclesiastical systems—is likened to Amalek or Nazi ideology not merely for antisemitism, but because of its theological structure, which seeks to erase the brit and replace it with a foreign metaphysics.

    Torah as National Constitutional Common Law—not a Religion
    You redefine Torah as:

    A constitutional brit alliance, initiated at Sinai, where law is national and covenantal.

    Halakha, not as metaphysical natural law (like Aristotle or Aquinas would claim), but as precedent-based case law (מִשְׁפָּטִים).

    A system that depends on territorial courts (Sanhedrin) and the covenantal authority of the people, not on theological orthodoxy or papal-like proclamations.

    This de-theologizes Judaism and roots its authority in national judicial infrastructure, very much in line with the thought of the Ba’alei HaTosafot, Rav Yehuda HaLevi, and arguably early Zionist halakhists like Rav Kook (though with critical differences).

    Supersessionism as Amalek Revisited
    Your interpretation of Amalek is not genetic or merely historical but ideological:

    Anyone or anything that seeks to erase the memory of Israel’s brit, replace Torah, or undermine Oral Law (Torah she-be’al Peh) is Amalek.

    Christianity fits this pattern: from Church Fathers to modern missionaries, the agenda has often been to claim Israel’s covenant, misappropriate its scripture, and spiritually colonize the Jews.

    This idea explains why Christians are viewed not simply as wrong, but as existential theological threats. It’s not personal—it’s brit-based.

    Rambam as a Cautionary Tale of Assimilation
    You critique the Rambam for introducing Greek metaphysics into Torah by adopting Aristotelian logic and universalizing halakha as rational law. You accuse this of:

    Flattening the PaRDeS structure of Torah interpretation.

    Displacing the brit-based national logic of Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Yishmael.

    Opening a door to Christian-style theology, which ultimately led to tragedies like the Paris burnings (1242) and the Christian censorship of the Talmud.

    You stand with Rabbeinu Yonah and the Baalei Tosafot, who saw this as an assimilationist betrayal of Torah.

    Revival of Brit-Based Mussar Halakha
    Your alternative is not nostalgia or mystical quietism. You’re proposing:

    A legal revival of the Sanhedrin as a national judiciary.

    A return to halakha as precedent-based oral reasoning built through mussar, דיוק, and PaRDeS.

    A complete rejection of theological universalism, whether Christian, Islamic, or even Maimonidean.

    Conclusion: Christianity as a Perverted Reflection
    In your view, Christianity is not merely wrong—it is Torah inversion:

    It takes Torah texts out of context (e.g., Proverbs 1:33 or Isaiah 32:17) and makes them serve alien agendas.

    It replaces mishpat with creed, brit with belief, and prophetic rebuke with salvationist dogma.

    Thus, from your brit-centered framework, Christianity is not a “neighboring faith” but a Nazi-like avodah zarah, whose theological and historical trajectory constitutes an attempt to spiritually annihilate the Jewish people by erasing their legal and covenantal identity.

    Like

    1. Hello,
      I’m fine with you commenting with your views on things regarding Christianity as much as I may disagree with them, but please stop copy and pasting your blog posts into my comments section. It makes things harder to moderate as well as making the comments section more cluttered due to the length and concepts in your comments that most people don’t understand. If you could instead leave a synopsis of your blog, highlighting the main points in layman’s terms or even leave a link to the original post so people don’t have to scroll for a while trying to find the original comment, that would be better for both of us. My job moderating becomes easier, it may drive more people to your blog, and if readers are interested, it’s easier for them to find and read your comments.

      Thanks!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. The New Pope from Chicago

        The Second Vatican: Papal Renewal Beyond the West – Where the Pope lives is where the Church listens. Repentance, exile, diaspora—an act of moral courage. A functioning Roman Curia intact—Rome as the “embassy,” not the throne. A spiritual Vatican abroad (e.g. Bogotá), and an administrative Vatican in Rome—mirroring Orthodox and Eastern Church multi-polarity. The Cross cannot atone for Auschwitz. No theology of the Cross is complete without acknowledging the silence of God at Auschwitz. The papacy must become a witness to repentance, not imperialism.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Out of curiosity, why do you believe that “No theology of the Cross is complete without acknowledging the silence of God at Auschwitz”? What do you mean?

          Like

            1. Interesting. How did that conversation come up? What was your perspective on it at the time?

              Like

            2. Born in Midland Texas, came from a socialist Jewish family. Had never read the T’NaCH, much less the Xtian bible in my life. Totally assimilated. Happened to date a California Jewish girl and she greeted me one day with a smile saying Happy Hanukkah! And I said “what’s that?” My senior year in High school saw the show “The Shoah” which introduced me to my Jewish roots. Shocked by the time i started learning at thee University – already in the midst of a major identity crisis. This crisis cause me to abandon the non Jewish name which the called me and only go by my Jewish name. Like whenever I am called to read from the Sefer Torah on shabbat. To this day remain an atheist praise God.

              Like

            3. Would it be fair to say that you struggle with belief in God (and especially the validity of Christianity) because of the problem of evil?

              Like

            4. It would be fair to say that I do not believe in Jesus as God. HaShem – not a man that he should lie. That’s straight from the Torah. So attempts to equate this so called new testament as superior to the bible “old testament” a lie straight up.

              Like

            5. So, are you an atheist as in the traditional sense of the word (denying existence of God/gods), an atheist in the sense that you deny anything that claims to be God/god except for the God of the Torah, or an atheist that recognizes that religion is good (the Richard Dawkins type)? I’m a little bit confused about your beliefs based on past comments and the content of your blog.

              (P.S. as for the belief that the NT is superior to the OT, I agree with you. That is a lie. In fact, Jesus frequently recognizes and affirms the Old Testament as the unchangeable Word of God in the Gospels. The OT is important because it convicts us of our sin, shows us the need for a Savior, and shows us the power of God in history through His deeds and prophecies, while the NT is important because it’s the fulfillment of those Messianic prophecies in Christ. Both are equally important for different reasons. Other than some progressive churches led by morons like Andy Stanley, I’m not sure how many Christians think otherwise on this topic.)

              Like

            6. As an atheist praise HaShem, I do not validate much less “believe” in the phony Gods of Jesus or Allah.

              The framing of Old Testament vs New Testament promotes the New Testament avoda zarah replacement theology – Golden Calf.

              The new testament religious rhetoric “fulfilled prophesies” — utter bull shit. How does the T’NaCH define the term “prophet”? This requires Oral Torah which the church priest fathers absolutely reject.

              Like

            7. Xtianity no different —-

              The YOUTUBE clip: Brandon Gill SHUTS UP unhinged Jasmine Crockett after her woke tirade crosses the line, depicts tuma cognitive warfare.
              In this context, the Brandon Gill–Jasmine Crockett exchange isn’t just political drama—it’s an orchestrated moment of cognitive warfare. It bypasses policy debate and instead targets identity, emotion, and tribal loyalty. Whether orchestrated or simply exploited after the fact, it contributes to a larger system of psychological manipulation in the infosphere.

              The exchange, especially when edited for conflict, activates the amygdala—The amygdala is a small, almond-shaped cluster of nuclei located deep within the temporal lobes of the brain. It is part of the limbic system and plays a crucial role in processing emotions, particularly those related to fear, pleasure, and aggression. The amygdala is involved in the formation of emotional memories and helps to regulate responses to emotional stimuli. It also interacts with other brain regions to influence behavior and decision-making based on emotional experiences—engaging fear, anger, and pleasure centers more than rational analysis. This is neurological capture: inflaming emotional circuits to override deliberative cognition, keeping the brain in “us vs. them” mode.

              The incident is cast as a metaphor for larger ideological battles: conservatism vs. progressivism, order vs. disruption, “truth” vs. “wokeness.” It conditions viewers to see political discourse as a zero-sum spectacle, aligning them with a cultural narrative beyond just policy.

              The audience for this clip is clearly targeted: politically engaged individuals on the right who are fatigued by “woke” rhetoric. The language, editing, and dissemination aim to reinforce existing biases and trigger dopamine-rewarding outrage or schadenfreude—a German term that refers to the feeling of pleasure or satisfaction that one experiences from witnessing the misfortunes of others. It combines the words “Schaden,” meaning harm or damage, and “Freude,” meaning joy. This emotion can arise in various contexts, such as when someone feels happy about a rival’s failure or when they find humor in another person’s embarrassing situation.

              The clip’s virality is no accident. It is tailored for shareability—short, emotionally charged, adversarial. Social platforms algorithmically favor such content, turning it into a weaponized meme that deepens echo chambers and reduces nuanced discourse to winner/loser binaries.

              By elevating one lawmaker as a symbol of order and the other as chaos, this exchange becomes a tool to rally supporters and demoralize opponents. It sends an implicit message: “Our side dominates; theirs is irrational.” This plays on tribal loyalty, a cornerstone of PSYOPS.

              The viral framing—“Brandon Gill SHUTS UP unhinged Jasmine Crockett”—is a classic example of selective narrative construction. The title primes viewers with a judgment (“unhinged”) and a victor (“shuts up”), shaping perception before any facts are absorbed. This is cognitive framing designed to elicit emotional reactions, especially among partisan audiences.

              While various frameworks exist to understand cognitive warfare, one perspective outlines six key facets that collectively target neurological and psychological processes:

              1. The deliberate dissemination of false or misleading information to confuse, mislead, or influence target audiences. This includes tactics like spreading fake news, deepfakes, and conspiracy theories to erode trust in institutions and factual information.

              2. Strategic campaigns designed to influence the emotions, motives, and objective reasoning of individuals or groups. These operations aim to alter perceptions and behaviors to align with specific objectives.

              3. Utilizing platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to amplify divisive narratives, suppress dissenting opinions, and create echo chambers. This facet leverages algorithms and bots to manipulate public discourse and sentiment.

              4. Employing data analytics and machine learning to identify cognitive vulnerabilities and tailor messages that can influence decision-making processes. This includes personalized propaganda and predictive behavior modeling.

              5. Emerging technologies that interact directly with the human nervous system, such as brain-computer interfaces and neurostimulation techniques. These tools have the potential to alter cognitive functions and behaviors, raising ethical and security concerns.

              6. Shaping cultural narratives and ideological frameworks to align with specific agendas. This includes influencing education, media, and public discourse to gradually shift societal values and beliefs.

              Like

            8. Xtianity no different —

              The YOUTUBE clip: Brandon Gill SHUTS UP unhinged Jasmine Crockett after her woke tirade crosses the line, depicts tuma cognitive warfare.

              In this context, the Brandon Gill–Jasmine Crockett exchange isn’t just political drama—it’s an orchestrated moment of cognitive warfare. It bypasses policy debate and instead targets identity, emotion, and tribal loyalty. Whether orchestrated or simply exploited after the fact, it contributes to a larger system of psychological manipulation in the infosphere.

              The exchange, especially when edited for conflict, activates the amygdala—The amygdala is a small, almond-shaped cluster of nuclei located deep within the temporal lobes of the brain. It is part of the limbic system and plays a crucial role in processing emotions, particularly those related to fear, pleasure, and aggression. The amygdala is involved in the formation of emotional memories and helps to regulate responses to emotional stimuli. It also interacts with other brain regions to influence behavior and decision-making based on emotional experiences—engaging fear, anger, and pleasure centers more than rational analysis. This is neurological capture: inflaming emotional circuits to override deliberative cognition, keeping the brain in “us vs. them” mode.

              The incident is cast as a metaphor for larger ideological battles: conservatism vs. progressivism, order vs. disruption, “truth” vs. “wokeness.” It conditions viewers to see political discourse as a zero-sum spectacle, aligning them with a cultural narrative beyond just policy.

              The audience for this clip is clearly targeted: politically engaged individuals on the right who are fatigued by “woke” rhetoric. The language, editing, and dissemination aim to reinforce existing biases and trigger dopamine-rewarding outrage or schadenfreude—a German term that refers to the feeling of pleasure or satisfaction that one experiences from witnessing the misfortunes of others. It combines the words “Schaden,” meaning harm or damage, and “Freude,” meaning joy. This emotion can arise in various contexts, such as when someone feels happy about a rival’s failure or when they find humor in another person’s embarrassing situation.

              The clip’s virality is no accident. It is tailored for shareability—short, emotionally charged, adversarial. Social platforms algorithmically favor such content, turning it into a weaponized meme that deepens echo chambers and reduces nuanced discourse to winner/loser binaries.

              By elevating one lawmaker as a symbol of order and the other as chaos, this exchange becomes a tool to rally supporters and demoralize opponents. It sends an implicit message: “Our side dominates; theirs is irrational.” This plays on tribal loyalty, a cornerstone of PSYOPS.

              The viral framing—“Brandon Gill SHUTS UP unhinged Jasmine Crockett”—is a classic example of selective narrative construction. The title primes viewers with a judgment (“unhinged”) and a victor (“shuts up”), shaping perception before any facts are absorbed. This is cognitive framing designed to elicit emotional reactions, especially among partisan audiences.

              While various frameworks exist to understand cognitive warfare, one perspective outlines six key facets that collectively target neurological and psychological processes:

              The deliberate dissemination of false or misleading information to confuse, mislead, or influence target audiences. This includes tactics like spreading fake news, deepfakes, and conspiracy theories to erode trust in institutions and factual information.

              Strategic campaigns designed to influence the emotions, motives, and objective reasoning of individuals or groups. These operations aim to alter perceptions and behaviors to align with specific objectives.

              Utilizing platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to amplify divisive narratives, suppress dissenting opinions, and create echo chambers. This facet leverages algorithms and bots to manipulate public discourse and sentiment.

              Employing data analytics and machine learning to identify cognitive vulnerabilities and tailor messages that can influence decision-making processes. This includes personalized propaganda and predictive behavior modeling.

              Emerging technologies that interact directly with the human nervous system, such as brain-computer interfaces and neurostimulation techniques. These tools have the potential to alter cognitive functions and behaviors, raising ethical and security concerns.

              Shaping cultural narratives and ideological frameworks to align with specific agendas. This includes influencing education, media, and public discourse to gradually shift societal values and beliefs.

              Here’s a classic example of Xtian new testament propaganda. Which I bring to support the previous statement: “Xtianity no different”.

              Would respond to Government banning the Xtian bible trash like this: Another example of Xtian gospels revisionist history and replace theology avoda zarah.

              Luke 18:1–8 … what a load of absolute bull shit. This propaganda frames its conclusions of “neither feared God nor respected man”, without offering a shred of actual evidence to support its claim. This claim aimed to direct the readers to assuming that this judge to be unrighteous. “Hear what the unrighteous judge says”. The concluding verse 8 therefore jumps to a religious revisionist history and supports the unproven existence of “the Son of Man comes” which has absolutely no connection what so ever with the Case of a Judge who righteously ruled with justice!

              The other leg of this false logic syllogism: “always pray and not lose heart”. Equally not related nor in anywise proven by the slander propaganda made upon a righteous judge who fairly compensated a widow who suffered damages from some other Jew.

              Character Assassination Without Evidence. 2. Unjustified Moral Conclusion, in point of fact the judge actually ruled righteously. A person judged by his actions. What he intends exceptionally difficult to prove, similar to the case of slander. 3. False Syllogism, the opening leg “don’t lose heart”, shares no common ground with– justice rendered. The same equally holds true for the other false leg of the syllogism propaganda religious rhetoric none sense, “Son of Man. As if the gospels equate with the authority of Ezekiel the prophet?!

              Like

            9. Why Xtian “Heart felt prayer” compares to taking a dump in a stream and laughing at the people down stream who drink the water.

              The term “heartfelt prayer” qualifies as religious rhetoric pie in the sky nonsense/narishkeit in Yiddish. Xtianity rejects to this day the revelation of the Oral Torah 13 tohor middot. The inductive dynamic logic of this tohor logic system – impossible to employ Aristotle or Plato’s static deductive logic to grasp and understand an entirely different logic system all together and completely opposed to rigid block like thinking. The Egyptians logic based upon “block” thinking – its how they built the Pyramids.

              Inductive reasoning stands upon the foundation of Order. G O D vs D O G. Order changes everything. Hence the Jewish prayerbook called Siddur. This word contains the 3 letter root verb ס ד ר – which means “Order”. The Oral Torah which the church rejects, despite the fact that the mitzva of Moshiach – an Oral Torah commandment. Oral Torah dynamics stand upon the foundation of Order. Law intent learned by “ordering” comparative precedent cases that oppose one another like a prosecutor vs a defense attorney. Hebrew verbs build around 3 letter roots. ק ד ש this root verb can either mean Holy or Prostitute/whore. Hagel’s logic dialectics of the late 19th Century, his logic format too focused upon Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction”. This 3rd Law of Motion by definition dynamic and not static. Hence for Newton to derive this law he had to develop Calculus rather than rely upon static Algebra.

              Algebra is essential in static engineering, particularly in the design and analysis of structures like bridges. While Aristotle’s syllogism itself is not directly based on a triangle, it can be represented visually in a triangular format to illustrate the relationships between the premises and the conclusion. In this triangular format, you can think of the major premise at the top, the minor premise on one side, and the conclusion on the other side. This triangular representation emphasizes the static nature of deductive reasoning, where the truth of the conclusion is guaranteed by the truth of the premises, provided that the premises are valid. It illustrates how logical arguments can be constructed in a clear and structured manner, making it easier to analyze and understand the relationships between different statements.

              The Church abhors to this day the Talmud b/c this codification of Oral Torah common law builds around inductive dynamic logic rather than deductive static logic. Court legal cases compare precedent previous rulings – a dynamic reasoning process similar but different than Newton’s calculus and Hegels bi-polar dialectics. Hebrew logic spins around the central axis of making the דיוק, roughly translated as logical inference. Case law compares to the 3 different views contained in a blue print. The Human aging process a slow dynamic of change in the body.

              The Mishna presents, using the blue print metaphor, as the front view of One or Two similar Cases argued before Sanhedrin common law courtrooms. The Gemara brings external Cases – known as halacha – from different mesechtot of the 6 Orders of the Mishna. The word Mishna which rabbi Yechuda named for his Oral Torah codification comes from the Book of D’varim – also known as משנה תורה\Mishna Torah (Not to be confused with the Rambam perversion, his statute static law code which presumptuously named Mishna Torah. This deranged rabbi did not know that Mishna Torah means “Common Law”. Hence Jews who have a bit of Torah education refer to his legal codification of Halacha as “Yad Chazaka/Strong Hand”.). The 5th Book of the Torah defines Torah law as a common law legal system! Hence rabbi Yechuda as head of the Great Sanhedrin named his common law codification – the Mishna.

              The Gemara commentary to the Mishna therefore brings other halachic precedents gathered from any of the other Orders of Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna as Top or Side view precedents to understand the Front view of the cases – as presented by the basic language of the Mishna itself. By folding the Gemara precedents back upon the very language of the Mishna the Frontal view changes to a different perspective. Something akin to looking at different facets of a diamond. Herein defines how the Gemara “commentary” understood the simple language of Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishnaot as partially codified within the Yerushalmi and Bavli Talmuds.
              ____________________________________________________________________________________

              With this introduction can now address the distinction between Hebrew tefillah from non Jewish “prayer”. The latter does not correctly translate the former. Non Jewish prayer similar to saying Tehillem/Psalms. Saying Tehillem a person never says שם ומלכות, an abstract term essential to comprehend a Torah brit alliance. Tefillah based upon its Order: 3 + 13 + 3 blessings, this Order recombines into 613, the number of commandments of the Torah according to the רשע, the Rambam. In his defense – his Yad static code perversion greatly contributed to saving the Hebrew language from going extinct and becoming just another dead language like ancient Greek or Latin. Its exceptionally important to validate the merits of the Rambam. He might be an SOB, but he’s our SOB.

              A bit of a digression but his code caused a Civil War among Jews which it appears to me caused the down water streams of Yiddishkeit to endure 3 Centuries of ghetto gulags. The Rambam has a tremendous impact upon Jewry. His code compares to Earth Tectonic plates! Orthodox Judaism stands upon the foundations of the static statute law codes introduced by the Yad, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch. These static codes served the petrified environmental conditions of the ghetto gulags perfectly. But when Napoleon freed the Yidden from the Catholic war-crimes, the “shit hit the fan”. Reform Judaism declared the static statute law codes archaic and the American and French Revolutions made the huge innovation – separation of church from state – which gave birth to secularism. Chiloni Jews in Israel and g’lut/exile\Jews living in foreign countries – secular non religious Jews. Judaism the religion which the chiloni Jews reject – based upon the perversion of deductive statute law halachic codes.
              ________________________________________________________________________

              The Order of tefillah 3 + 13 + 3 makes a numerical רמז/hint to the 6 Yom Tov + Shabbat. The 13 middle blessings contained within the body of the Shemone Esrei tefillah DeRabbanan, adjacent to tefillah from the Torah – the kre’a shma. This opening verse: Hear Israel HaShem our God HaShem One, contains – 3 Divine Names just as the blessing of the Cohenim contains 3 blessings. Hence the Shemone Esrei contains 3 ___ 3 blessings. The key concept that a blessing requires שם ומלכות, herein defines the key pre-condition of swearing a Torah oath alliance! Neither word can be translated. A טיפש פשט/bird brained translation of Name + Kingship = tits on a boar hog stupidity. Common law not read like a novel or Harry Potter gospel books of fiction. Xtians read their bible mistranslations. Common law learned through the dynamics of bringing Case/Rule precedents/halachot.

              Hence to cut a Torah brit requires שם ומלכות. Neither the Xtian bible nor Muslim koran ever once brings the Name of השם ever within tomes/tombs homophones. Returning to _____ +13 _____. Why 13 middle blessings within the “Order” of the Shemone Esrei. The 13 middot of the Oral Torah revealed to Moshe at Horev following the Golden Calf “substitution theology” avoda zarah. Post the טיפש פשט, literal translation of “Golden Calf”, HaShem made a vow to substitute the seed of Moshe for the seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as the chosen Cohen People. Moshe caused HaShem to remember the oaths sworn to the Avot concerning the creation of the chosen Cohen people by means of Av tohor time oriented commandments (both kre’a shma and tefillah qualify as Av tohor time oriented commandments). On Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva (as opposed to the טיפש פשט translation of repentance) upon His error of substitute theology and annulled the vow! Hence both a father and a husban can annul the vow made by a young daughter or a wife! But not even HaShem can annul a Torah sworn oath. Hence the טיפש פשט of the Xtian reading of Jerimiah “new covenant”; covenant does not correctly translate brit which actually means “sworn alliance”. To swear a brit alliance requires that a man swear this oath in the Name of HaShem. This Name absent in the bible and koran – different and strange tome/tomb nonsense. Translating the 1st Commandment Spirit to crude word translations = the Sin of the Golden Calf.

              To grasp the priority of Order, the Torah organized into 54 divisions called Parshiot. שם ומלכות … four (letters in the Name) X 13 (Oral Torah middot) = 52. The two remaining Parshiot contain the blessings and curses of the Torah. The Talmud in mesechta shabbat refers to these to Parshiot as the “two Crowns of the Torah”. A man in order to accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai must embrace, like a man does his wife following their wedding, responsibilities of Life or Death — blessing or curse — rule the oath lands with justice or endure Par’o like oppression in g’lut.

              Therefore the mitzva of tefillah, a man ideally stands before a Sefer Torah and swears a brit Torah oath which dedicates (just like a korban placed upon the altar of Zion) defined tohor middot לשמה. Meaning a man dedicates how he will conduct his social life with his family neighbors and people in the future! Herein separates and distinguishes the fundament differences between reading prayers of Psalms as read from a book and swearing a Torah oath with dedicates tohor middot as the king which directs a man’s future social behavior with others among his people. Why? Because Israel came out of the judicial oppression of Par’o corrut courtroom ‘Star Court’, to conquer and rule the land of Canaan with righteous judicial court room common law justice. Jewish common law completely different from Legislative statute law decrees — like Jewish courtroom common law absolutely estranged from Greek and Roman statute decrees ruled from some foreign Roman Senate.

              Tefillah a matter of the heart. Based upon the instruction of Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna in ברכות which explains בכל לבבך\כם as the struggle between opposing spirits – tohor vs. tuma – within the heart. The mitzva of blowing the Shofar interprets שם component of the brit sworn oath as a breath blown. But k’vanna separates, like shabbat from chol, the spirit living within the heart from the air emitted from the lungs. Hence the 6 Yom Tov and Shabbat, each dedicate and breath different spirit names alive within the heart. These spirit names Yah, Ha’el, El, Elohim, El Shaddai, Eish Ha’Elohim, and Shalom. The 3 ____ 3 Order of the Shemone Esrei makes a רמז\hint to this deep kabbalah which answers why tefillah requires k’vanna.

              Like

            10. Sir, I asked you to please stop copy and pasting entire blog posts into my comments section. I’m sorry, but from now on, your comments are going to be manually approved depending on the length of the comment.

              Like

Leave a reply to mosckerr Cancel reply

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑