News: This Should Disturb Everyone – The Rape Gang Inquiry and the Role the British Government Had in it.

Britian has fallen to jihad.

This is the truth that the world has known for decades now, but has been too afraid to admit for fear of being called “racist,” “Islamophobe,” “bigot,” etc. But now, thanks to the work of Rupert Lowe, the only person in the British Parliament with the moral compass to put it together, we now have the report that proves what anyone with common sense has been saying for years.

Last Tuesday, the Rape Gang Inquiry released a 219-page report, detailing their findings. Already, we knew it was going to be bad, but the sheer scale of the rape gangs is worse than could have ever been imagined. From the late 1990s to today, 250,000 young women as young as 11 were subjected to grooming, rape, trafficking, pregnancies (many of which were ended due to miscarriages from trauma or forced abortions), and forced Islamic conversions.

[Author’s Note: And that’s only what’s been reported. The report itself admits that the number of victims is likely higher.]

Meanwhile, the government was completely silent about the rape gangs, allowing them to act with impunity. Every level of government meant to protect British citizens failed the victims at every turn, from schools ignoring girls who were obviously being sexually abused, to the government downplaying and ignoring the problem, and desperately trying to silence anyone who spoke out, including actual victims.

Don’t believe me? Here are some survivor testimonies from the report:

‘Whitney’
‘Whitney’ grew up in a vulnerable household. Her mother suffered from severe mental health issues, and her father was absent from her life.
She was first groomed and sexually abused at the age of 15 by two adult Pakistani brothers. One of the brothers, Whitney recalls, acted as a boyfriend figure. Both brothers would regularly take her to a flat in Birmingham, supply her with alcohol, and in her words she would “have sex with them.”

Their interactions with Whitney soon turned violent. They began beating her and, on one occasion, held a hot iron to her face. Whitney recalls that the brothers stopped contacting her after they arrived at her house to collect her and found all of her uncles sitting on the wall outside. After that incident, they never came back. She cannot remember exactly how or why her uncles were there, but she believes her mother had asked them to intervene.

Many years later, Whitney’s daughter began self-harming at age eleven and even attempted suicide. Her phone contained sexually explicit messages. Whitney’s daughter told her there was a “sex room” at school run by the older boys. Deeply concerned for her daughter, Whitney contacted social services. They offered little support beyond talking through the problems. In one instance, social services accidentally sent her six other children’s case files instead of her
daughter’s, which left her deeply distrustful of their ability to help.

Whitney’s daughter was coerced into sending a sexual image, which was then circulated across multiple schools, the local community, and eventually the internet. This led to her receiving unwanted attention from adult men of various ethnicities and from multiple countries. From that point on, Whitney’s daughter began going missing regularly. These disappearances were directly linked to sexual demands and exploitation by older boys and adult men.

She was threatened with violence if she contacted the police and sometimes returned home with items of clothing missing. Whitney repeatedly reported her concerns to the police and social services, clearly stating that she believed her daughter was being sexually exploited. Police responses were often delayed, statements were not taken, and investigations were closed without further action. Social services refused to relocate the family, downgraded the risk level,
and eventually closed the case despite ongoing exploitation.

Whitney herself was blamed, and her own past was used to undermine her credibility as a parent. Her family received repeated threats, including warnings that their house would be burned down, faces would be slashed, and machetes would be used. Later, Whitney discovered that her daughter had been placed on the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) as a trafficking victim – without her being informed. The NRM is the UK’s official framework for identifying, referring, and supporting victims of human trafficking and modern slavery and serves as a recognition by a designated professional that an individual is a potential victim of human trafficking or modern slavery.

‘Sally’
‘Sally’ is the mother of a daughter who was found guilty of nine counts of perverting the course of justice for lying about being groomed by an Asian grooming gang and sentenced to eight years in prison. Despite this, Sally believes there is evidence to suggest her daughter was a genuine victim of the gangs.

Sally described a previously stable, working family life until housing instability and family stress coincided with changes in her daughter’s behaviour. The house the family were buying fell through, but they had already moved out of their family home and all their possessions were in storage. A family friend was able to rent them a part-renovated property on a short-term basis, but it was not ideal for a family with four children. It was only meant to be temporary, but the
family ended up staying there for ten months.

Her daughter began making up stories, such as claiming her mother and stepdad were going away and leaving her to look after her five-year-old brother at school. This resulted in school involvement in their family life. The stresses the household was under led to arguments that brought in both the police and social services. After leaving school at 16, Sally’s daughter began working at a local pub.

On one occasion she was invited to a party. Sally received a call later that evening from one of her daughter’s friends saying that her daughter was lying on the pavement outside the property. If Sally couldn’t pick her up, they were going to take her to the bus stop and leave her there, as she was making too much noise. When her mother found her lying on the ground, she was making a horrendous wailing sound and kept saying not to touch her. Her mother recognized that something was seriously wrong and took her to hospital.

Sally’s daughter told the nurse carrying out the examination that she had been sexually assaulted. The hospital notes recorded that her genitalia were swollen and red. The hospital reported the incident to the police. Sally’s daughter then received threats via Snapchat, became scared about the outcome of the case, and withdrew from the process. Around the same time, social services closed their case on the family. Sally believes her daughter did not want to invite more trouble into the household.

It later emerged in court that they had all been smoking cannabis. Sally believes her daughter had participated and that something had happened to her, but she was found guilty of lying about being raped.

Sally’s daughter then began working as a kitchen assistant at a care home and a glass collector at a nightclub, in addition to her pub job. After turning 18, she was able to work behind the bar at the nightclub, where her behaviour began to change. She would return home with cuts and bruises. On one occasion she came back with a black eye and said there had been a fight in the nightclub and she had been hit accidentally. She appeared more tired and distressed than usual. Sally began to notice that her daughter’s phone would ring regularly, with “Asian” men’s names appearing on the screen. When asked about them, her daughter tried to hide the calls. The bar manager stopped her daughter from working on the main floor because she was small and they struggled to keep track of her. They also ensured she was always paired with an older member of
staff, as the “Asian” men would harass her if she was working alone. One “Asian” man gifted her a gold chain.

Sally’s daughter began saying she wanted to move away from home. She had regularly travelled to a nearby town by train. Sally would pick her up and drop her off at the station, and she never appeared to have been drinking or using drugs. One day, Sally returned home to find her daughter had left with her possessions and was ignoring her calls. She had told work colleagues that she had moved because her stepfather was harming her, but this was not true. After a few days of investigation, Sally managed to find where her daughter had moved to. When she arrived at the flat, she found her daughter with two police officers to whom she was reporting an allegation of rape. When her daughter handed in her phone as evidence, the police found hundreds of messages from “Asian” men. They believed she was being groomed. She was later found guilty of lying about the rape she had reported.

Over the course of the following year, Sally reported her daughter missing thirty-nine times. She would often turn up in various towns across the region, battered, bruised, intoxicated or on drugs. She was usually without underwear and spent increasing amounts of time in hospital. One police force made a referral to the NRM, believing she was a victim of trafficking. Another police force repeatedly arrested her and seized her phone, which meant the referral
agency could not contact her as her number kept changing. One incident involved Sally’s daughter being locked in a room above an Indian restaurant, with the man refusing to let her leave. The police ignored it, believing she was lying. Another incident involved an “Asian” man following her, trying to grab her and take her away. Thankfully she was with her sister and friends, who quickly put her in a taxi and sent her home. That same man waslater arrested for breaking into a woman’s house and sexually assaulting her while she slept – nevertheless, the police still insisted Sally’s daughter had been lying about the earlier incident. The police believed she had a mental health condition and was deliberately self-harming and putting herself in dangerous situations. They wanted to have her sectioned, but a doctor disagreed, noting
that she still had capacity.

Another incident involved a different “Asian” man who refused to leave Sally’s daughter’s flat. Police told him to leave but asked no questions. He left behind a balaclava, yet the police showed no interest despite him carrying it while visiting a young woman. After her flat door was kicked down in yet another incident while she was missing, she returned to her mother’s home.
Sally’s daughter later explained that she had moved away to keep her family safe. She claimed she had been told that if she did not do as her abusers said, they would harm her brother, rape her sister, and firebomb the house. She had lied to her colleagues about her stepdad to avoid bringing repercussions on the family.

She went missing again. The police stated they believed she was making the whole thing up and injuring herself, so they charged her with perverting the course of justice. Part of her bail conditions required her not to leave Sally’s house. The following week, her daughter attempted suicide by overdose. She went missing one final time and was found in a field with injuries to her head and ear, a severed finger, and numerous cuts and bruises.

Following this, she wrote a post on Facebook alleging that she had been a victim of grooming gangs. The post went viral. Within half an hour, the police arrested her and she was sent to prison.

Following her daughter’s conviction, the family experienced sustained harassment and intimidation, particularly from one Muslim man. Sally reports repeated failures by the police to protect them. She believes her daughter was a vulnerable young woman who lied at times but was nevertheless groomed

At this point, you may be wondering why the government let this happen. The answer is disturbingly simple. The British government has done nothing for almost 80 years because the perpetrators are Muslim, mainly coming from Pakistan (the report found that at least 90% or more of the traffickers were Pakistani.)

Now, you might be wondering why I said 80 years instead of 20 or 30. After all isn’t this a more recent issue?

The reason I say “80 years” is because the earliest cases of rape gangs grooming, abducting, raping, and trafficking British women go as far back as the 1950s, with at least 200+ reports coming from the British towns of Bradford, Keighley, Halifax, and elsewhere in 1955. Much of this was because previously, in 1948, the British government passed the British Nationality Act, which gave those living in British commonwealths the same rights as those living in the British Isles. This allowed people from those commonwealths to live and work in Britian and was instrumental in allowing massive immigration.

Fast forward to the 1960s, and things only got worse. Not only did a wave of immigration of Pakistani Muslims begin after the displacement of 280 villages in the Mipur region of Pakistan, but new laws went into effect with the Race Relations Act of 1965 and another act similar to it in 1976. The Rape Gang Inquiry records this, writing:

The legal framework that underpinned this paralysis began with the Race Relations Act 1965 and its even stronger successor in 1976. These statutes, designed to combat overt discrimination, were interpreted and expanded in ways that made any discussion of ethnicity or culture in crime patterns hazardous.

Things continued to worsen in the decades that followed. In 1971, two members of Parliament – Jill Knight and Renee Short – brought up concerns about child prostitution in Birmingham and members of both sides of the political spectrum reported weekly sexual attacks perpetrated by immigrants. Their concerns were sadly justified as throughout the ’70s and ’80s, at least 4,000 British girls were victims of the grooming gangs.

Then, in the 1990s, the original final boss of creating the fear of being called racist dropped. In 1999, the Macpherson Report branded police as being “institutionally racist” after the murder of Stephen Lawrence. Macpherson’s definition of racism, however, was so broad that almost anything could constitute as such, and police and social workers became petrified of doing anything that could be construed as such. And so, the Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs were ignored even more as the police refused to do anything about them for fear of their actions being misconstrued as targeting ethnic minorities.

From there, over the course of the 2000s and 2010s, the law only became worse. In the name of progressive policies, more laws were passed making it near impossible to prosecute the grooming gangs. The Equality Act of 2010 was especially bad, with the report writing:

The country’s transformation was greatly accelerated under Tony Blair’s New Labour project, which culminated in the Equality Act 2010. This consolidated and strengthened so-called ‘anti-discrimination’ protections by adding religion as a protected characteristic alongside race. Combined with hate crime legislation under Part III of the Public Order Act 1986 and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, it created an environment in which criticising aspects of Islamic culture or patterns of offending linked to Muslim communities could be framed as ‘racial hatred’ or ‘Islamophobia.’ Official definitions of ‘Islamophobia’ promoted by some campaign groups further blurred the line between legitimate concern and blind prejudice. The result was a chilling effect across public institutions. Police forces, social services, and local councils repeatedly chose silence or denial over robust investigation because the political and professional costs of appearing to single out Muslims was deemed too high. The Casey National Audit of 2025 confirmed this pattern, noting that authorities shied away from examining ethnicity and culture even when the data pointed overwhelmingly to Pakistani Muslim perpetrators.

From a combination of allowing almost unchecked immigration into Britian and a refusal to do anything to investigate or arrest groups of people because of their race, the British Government has allowed one of the worst scandals in the world to be covered up.

But unfortunately, guys, this is only the tip of the iceberg. None of this happened in a vacuum. Government inaction has allowed Muslims to do this in the name of their god.

Until next time,

M.J.