Your “uniquely immune” well-funded western colony has been eradicating the native Palestinians and regularity committing crimes against the Geneva convention for over seven damn decades, and you monsters respond by attempting to justify this Genocide and push for worse treatment of Arabs using these unsubstantiated (and even admittedly false) claims of mass rape and burned babies (which were proven to be AI photos..) – American Queer
Israel does not deserve to exist. – American Queer
while I have seen the idf use Palestinian people as human shields on videos they have to post themselves because this is the largest, most documented genocide yet you’re so ignorant you stilll think the idf are angels. – D.J.
Have you even seen all the instagram posts that Palestinians themselves are posting, documenting their own genocide. – D.J.
So why are Christians also saying this is genocide? – D.J.
and remember this has not being going on for a year, its been going on since 1948. Norman Finklesteins a jew, maybe listen to him cause he agrees its genocide. – D.J.
A few weeks ago, I wrote a piece debunking the idea that Israel is committing a genocide and now it’s time to talk about the actual genocide that Hamas and Hezbollah have attempted. Let’s get into it.
First of all, who are they targeting? Well, unlike the vague and empty claim that Israel is targeting Palestinians, we know who Hamas and Hezbollah are targeting: the entire nation of Israel and, by extension, anyone who’s a Jew, whether practicing or not. This fulfils the three out of four requirements for something to be considered a genocide by definition as they’re targeting Jews for their religion, ethnicity, and nation. Even here in the U.S., protest groups who are being backed by terrorist groups are targeting Jews for these reasons.
As if that wasn’t enough, Hamas and Hezbollah weren’t just targeting soldiers, the people who could be a threat, but were actively killing civilians including children and the elderly, many of whom they raped and tortured before ending their lives. They also took 250 people hostage (including several Americans), whom they have raped and tortured, killing several of them as well, keeping them in some of the worst conditions known to man. Here are some links to articles talking about these atrocities: Hamas’s October 7 Attack: Visualizing the Data IDF video shows ‘horrific conditions’ in tunnel where 6 hostages were held, executed | The Times of Israel Israeli woman bravely describes horror as Hamas hostage: ‘They were taking pleasure in hurting me’ Freed Israeli hostage speaks out about terrifying Hamas capture, describes ‘spiderweb’ of tunnels | Fox News Their bodies tell their stories. They’re not alive to speak for themselves. Children were shot and burned alive on October 7, forensic evidence shows
All of these things that I’ve talked about are considered war crimes under the Geneva Convention (icrc-002-0365.pdf War crime – Wikipedia ). On page 7 of Basic Rules of The Geneva Conventions and Their Additional Protocols, it says:
Pretty much everything listed on here as a war crime is something that Hamas and Hezbollah has committed. The reason why they haven’t been tried as they should be by the UN or anyone else is because Hamas and Hezbollah are not recognized as actual military entities, but as terrorist entities, though they are being funded by people like Iran. Thus, they are legally not obliged to follow these rules and are given freedom to run amok, killing, murdering, raping, and pillaging.
But remember that Israel’s the bad guy, here even though if anyone does commit a crime, they are investigated and punished if guilty, and the IDF follows very strict guidelines for engaging in combat with the enemy. But remember that Israel’s the bad guy when they specifically target ambulances which are being used by Hamas to transport terrorists and weapons (Hamas admits using ambulances for terrorist transportation in leaked phone call ).
But I guess that that’s just too evil for these Leftists.
Until next time,
M.J.
The Tanuki Corner 
Why the Jews Reject the Christian and Muslim Worship of Avoda Zarah Gods.
Translating abstract Hebrew concepts, such as שם ומלכות, into literal translations is highly problematic. Neither the Koran nor the New Testament ever once brings the שם השם revealed in the First Sinai commandment. This commandment instructs to perform the Torah commandments לשמה (for their own sake).
The New Testament heavily relies upon the metaphor of “father” throughout the Gospel narratives. One reference in Deuteronomy 32:6: “Is this the way you repay the Lord, you foolish and unwise people? Is he not your Father, your Creator, who made you and formed you?”
This strong mussar rebuke merits a common law search for a precedent within the language of the first four Books of the Written Torah. Paul’s critique: “You’re not under the Law” fails to discern between Torah common law/משנה תורה\ from Greek and Roman statute law legal formats.
The Torah never refers to the First commandment revelation of the Spirit Name with any reference to the foreign name Allah. Hence Jews reject this foreign substitution to replace the revelation of the Torah at Sinai with Muhammad’s revelation of Allah in a cave.
The Jewish people utterly amazed that Goyim have no concept of the distinction between tohor vs tumah spirits. This fundamental distinction required for the chosen Cohen people to do “avodat HaShem”; roughly interpreted as the service or worship of HaShem.
The term מלכות refers to the spiritual direction of dedicating defined tohor spirits first revealed to Moshe after the Sin of the Gold Calf at Horev: ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc. The revelation of this “Oral Torah” the church fathers absolutely deny the existence of the revelation of the Oral Torah.
The only other verse in the whole of the T’NaCH which employs 3 Divine Names in succession, kre’a Shma. Contrast the mitzva of saying kre’a shma with tefillen; with how Goyim scholars interpret Hear Israel the Lord God the Lord is One. The Talmud understands the 3 Divine Names, to the 3 oaths each separately sworn by the Avot.
The term ONE, the last word of the kre’a shma, the person who accepts the yoke of the kingdom of heaven, he accepts the oaths separately sworn by Avraham, Yitzak and Yaacov as ONE upon his heart.
The purpose of tefillen: to swear a Torah oath. Goyim theologies never ask: what oaths did the Avot swear to cut a brit with HaShem concerning the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Islam in particular give a blow-job to the honor of the circumcised Avot. Christians see the Shema as a declaration of the oneness of God, which aligns with their belief in the Trinity—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—as one God in three persons. Muslim commentaries on the Shema recognize its importance in affirming the oneness of God, which is a central tenet of Islam.
The Quran makes intertextual connections with the Shema, emphasizing that prayer and devotion to God are not about physical direction but about loving God with all one’s heart. This latter idea fails to address Rabbi Yechuda’s interpretation of לבבך as Yatzir Ha’Tov vs. Yatzir Ha’Rah.
The concept of ‘resurrection from the dead’ shares nothing with life after death as both religions of avoda zarah preach. Rather the Yazir Ha’Tov breaths the spirits which did breath the spirits of the Avot! ONE, this concluding word of the Shma raises the Avot from the dead within the Yatzir Ha’Tov of each and every Jew in all generations, based upon the power to Create from nothing, by swearing a Torah oath!
Hence when a Cohen didicated a korban upon the altar in Jerusalem, the portion of Israel in the korbonot avodat HaShem service, they read the Creation story in the beit knesset.
Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah known as פרדס defines how to logically understand how to employ the 13 tohor middot, as the critical means to make a precedent search comparison; the substance of Oral Torah common law scholarship upon the Written Torah. A quick examination of Deuteronomy 32:6 learns through the wisdom of Torah common law precedents.
This mussar rebuke begins at 32:1 – 32:43. Mussar defines all prophecies, as codified by Moshe Rabbeinu and all other NaCH prophets. Goyim do not know this basic fundamental of Torah faith/pursuit of courtroom justice.
Their Gospel forgery attempts to pervert tohor prophets to Av tumah witchcraft and sorcerers – who predict the future. This one Torah reference to “Father” merits a look at the previous verse for context. Both Trinity or strict monotheism qualifies as strange worship of foreign Gods.
These alien Gods have no connection with the plagues in Egypt, the splitting of the Sea of Reeds, nor the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. They directly compare to the Av tumah Golden Calf.
This revelation, that all Goyim to this day reject the Torah Sinai revelation. This prophetic mussar directly refers to the tuma worship of foreign alien Gods imported to Judaism by Av tuma Xtianity and Islam.
This tremendous mussar rebuke, Deut. 32:1 – 32:43, compares to the vow which HaShem made to Moshe following the sin of the Golden Calf! Hence the rebuke of Moshe at the end of his life serves to amplify the prophetic mussar taught through the Aggadic story of Noach and the floods. Genesis 6:5 to 8:20: the exile of Noach in his Ark, story of Aggadic mussar – a depth analysis of prophetic mussar of Deut. 32:1 – 32:43.
How could post Shoah Jewry defeat 5 Arab Armies and win our National Independence as a Nation after 2000+ years of oppressive exile? No Goyim courts of law ever once forced any church priest or pastor or any Sheik, to stand before the Bar and receive judgment for their evil war crimes committed repeatedly against the Jewish people and all Humanity in General.
A simple precedent by which to grasp this prophetic mussar of g’lut. A fundamental Torah theme which the Apostle Paul’s “original sin” substitute theology totally uprooted in Goyim minds.
The 1st Sinai commandment functions as the greatest commandment of the entire Torah. And it has no hint or reference to the Xtian Trinity Creed nor the Muslim Monotheism substitute theology Tawhid Creeds.
The abstract term מלכות refers to the korban-like dedication of living blood thrown upon the altar; to the dedication of one or more of the 13 tohor middot Spirits revealed to Moshe at Horev, 40 days after the Sin of the Golden Calf, where a portion of Israel attempted to translate the Spirit Name of the 1st Sinai revelation into the word אלהים.
Tefillah qualifies as the oath dedication of specific defined tohor middot as מלכות. The Order of the Shemone Esrei 3 + 13 + 3 Blessings. Contained within this Order the רמז of 613. Furthermore the order of this standing prayer holds a רמז to the 6 Yom Tov + Shabbat menorah!
Herein understands the Torah concept of מלכות required to swear a Torah oath. The dedication of tohor middot directly compare to the Cohen throwing living blood upon the altar. Hence tefillah stands in the stead of korbanot!
Why? Because both korbanot & tefillah both swear a Torah oath which dedicates tohor middot לשמה.
The Torah openly states that nothing in the Heavens, Seas, or Earth compares to the revelation of the Spirit Name of HaShem. How much more so for imbecile word translations that attempt to convert the Divine Presence Spirit revelation of the Name into words that the lips of man can easily pronounce!
The substitute religions of Av tuma avoda zarah attempt to foist belief in JeZeus or Allah as some “new covenant” Torah faith. These abominations fail to grasp that Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice rather than belief in theological Gods which the mind of Man cannot possibly grasp nor understand.
T’shuva does not correctly translate as repentance. T’shuva learns from HaShem annulling His vow to make the chosen Cohen nation from the seed of Moshe rather than the seed of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov. Chag Yom Kippur commemorates this t’shuva made by HaShem. The Torah specifically employs the term t’shuva wherein HaShem annulled His vow to make the chosen Cohen nation from the seed of Moshe rabbeinu rather than from the oaths sworn to the Avot to this effect.
When the Romans renamed Judea unto the “Palestine”, herein represents a historical example of t’shuva. The Romans sought to physically wipe out the existence and memory of the Jewish people, just as did Hitler’s Nazis!
That the new testament and koran have no awareness of the oath brit faith, how tefillah differs from prayer because tefillah absolutely requires swearing a Torah oath as its time oriented commandment “k’vanna”; whereas prayer has nothing to do with swearing a Torah oath! These religious forgeries know nothing about the Torah faith which prioritized the obligation placed upon Torah Sanhedrin courts to pursue righteous compensation of damages inflicted by the guilty upon the innocent.
This concept of annulling a vow derived from Torah common law precedent commandments concerning a father and his daughter or a husband and his wife, where both could annul the vow made by either a girl or a woman. The Roman attempt to expunge the memory of the Jewish state of Judea likewise serves as an example of the intent of annulling a vow. As does UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/19, adopted on December 21, 2017. This resolution declared the status of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital as “null and void” and called on all states to refrain from establishing diplomatic missions in Jerusalem.
The Xtian and Muslim concepts concerning their Gods fundamentally contradict the 2nd Sinai commandment. T’NaCH and Talmudic traditions define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment through the Torah precedents which forbid pursuing the ways of the Goyim which reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev; and the specific commandment not to intermarry foreign wives. King Shlomo worshipped avoda zarah when he copied the Goyim practices of building grand Temples and married foreign wives. The mitzva of building the Beit HaMikdash centers upon establishment of Sanhedrin Common law courts across the land. Hence the Sages placed the Great Sanhedrin within the Temple itself! Jews do not worship wood and stone idols or buildings! The oppressive slavery where Par’o withheld straw, yet beat Israeli slaves, upon this basic Torah precedent – stands Torah faith to pursue judicial justice.
Neither Xtianity nor Islam ever attempted to return the Jewish people to our homeland as did the great king of Persia. The Persian king Cyrus, referred to as a “messiah” or “anointed one.” This reference found in Isaiah 45:1, which states: “Thus says the Lord to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have grasped, to subdue nations before him and strip kings of their robes, to open doors before him— and the gates shall not be closed.” In this context, the term “anointed” (מָשִׁיחַ, mashiach), used to describe Cyrus, indicating that he was chosen by God to achieve a specific purpose, namely, to facilitate the return of the Jewish people to their homeland and the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem. The Torah mitzva of Moshiach anoints a Jewish king to rule the land with judicial common law Sanhedrin court room justice.
The Persian king learned from the successful conquest of the Assyrian empire by the Babylonian empire. The Assyrians uprooted entire populations of conquered nations and replaced those uprooted populations with foreign aliens who had no connection to the land they now dwelt therein. This reality permitted the Babylonian Armies to conquer the Assyrian empire much like water goes through a sieve. Roman new testament propaganda stands in stark contrast with the great king of Persia. The Romans sought to promote social anarchy and Civil War among the Jewish people. In this effort they succeeded as well as they did destroying Herod Temple. The British government during its Palestine mandate period, likewise foisted a divide and rule policy between Arabs and Jews.
Both the Syrian Greeks and the Romans based their social order of society upon the ideas of ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle and others. Aristotle served as a key advisor to Alexander the Great. Aristotle’s 3 part syllogism does not compare to rabbi Akiva’s 4 part פרדס logic system. All logic requires order: the arrangement of the letters God vs Dog radically changes what a person perceives as the idea communicated! In equal manner Order defines the Jewish Prayer Book known as the Siddur. The Siddur contains the root word סדר which refers to Order.
Why do Jews view Xtianity and Islam as Av Tuma avoda zarah? Goyim never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. JeZeus did not observe the mitzva of shabbat. This mitzva requires that Jews make the הבדלה/distinction that discerns like from like; מלאכה from עבודה. Failure to understand the subtle distinction which separates these two verbs, both of which translate to “work”, means that such an Am Ha’aretz never keeps the mitzva of shabbat observance ever in his or her life.
Mesechta Shabbat learns מלאכה whereas mesechta Baba Kama learns עבודה. The question do the toldot follow the Avot asked by both mesechtot. Baba Kama distinguishes between tam and muad damagers. The latter applies to Man because it requires intent. 4 Avot Muad damagers: Oppression, theft, ערוה, and judicial bribery.
Shabbat observance dedicates not doing forbidden מלאכה on the day of shabbat so as likewise to not do forbidden עבודה during the 6 days of the week of shabbat. The Goyim religions of Av tuma avoda zarah never grasped this fundamental distinction of shabbat observance as a mitzva.
Both Xtianity and Islam superficially claim to respect shabbat, but their religious rhetoric as empty as Arabs eating camel flesh but abhorring pork! These religions of avoda zarah have no awareness of the chosen Cohen people and the Divine oath inheritance to the oath sworn brit lands.
Repentance, an empty Christian idea of personal regret, shares no common ground with t’shuva, which is based on the annulling of vows. Neither the father nor the husband “regrets” annulling a vow made by his daughter or wife. Therefore, t’shuva shares no common ground with the Christian void concept of repentance.
Similarly, the translation of “covenant” does not share any common ground with the Hebrew word ברית. The latter is an oath alliance. To swear an oath alliance requires שם ומלכות. The New Testament and Koran forgeries never bring the שם השם as revealed in the first Sinai commandment. Therefore, both books of foreign religions worship other gods, violating the 2nd Sinai commandment. Both know nothing that a Torah brit requires swearing a Torah oath with the intent to cut an eternal alliance.
All T’NaCH prophets command mussar. Herein defines the intent or k’vanna of all T’NaCH prophecy. The New Testament Roman forgery does not comprehend these subtle distinctions. This latter forgery seeks to promote civil war among Jewish society by perverting prophecy into Av tuma witchcraft, which makes predictions concerning the future. Throughout the Gospel narrative this type of silly narishkeit spews from the new testament like farts.
Chaos and anarchy defined the Jewish revolt attempts against the Romans. Multiple and many Jewish sects dominated the 66 rebellion. Bar Kokhba’s revolt failed to unite Jews of Judea with a well-timed & coordinated Jewish revolt together with the Jews of Alexandria Egypt.
Furthermore, that general failed to drive the Roman legions out of Damascus, Syria, a critical error.
These critical errors of judgment doomed this second Jewish revolt from success. Jewish social anarchy and civil war greatly contributed to the Roman victory over the Jewish revolts in 66 and 135. The key concept of Torah faith revolves around the righteous pursuit of judicial justice within the borders of the oath-sworn brit lands – the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen nation.
The false avoda zara Av tuma religions, which worship other gods; they pervert the Torah vision of faith into some theological creed-based personal belief system. This substitute theology attempts to subvert the Torah faith of the righteous pursuit of judicial justice obligations, which makes a fair compensation of damages inflicted by party A upon party B, replaced by personal belief in JeZeus or Allah.
Av tuma Avoda zara substitute theologies attempt to supplant their creed based personal belief in theologically defined belief systems, which define their gods as either a 3-part One God mystery or a simple One God monotheism. Despite the simple fact that monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai commandment. Moshe travelled to Egypt, and the 10 plagues judged the gods of Egypt. Just as did HaShem judge the Gods worshipped by the Canaanite kings.
The sworn oath brit cut at GilGal, as expressed through the Rashi tefillen recalls the reality that Goyim worship other Gods. The lights of Hanukkah reject Greek philosophy. Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס four basis logic system radically differs from Aristotle’s 3 part syllogisms.
Greek philosophy qualifies as a foreign substitute theology on par with the Christian and Muslim later attempts at replacement theology. Hence Jews who study philosophy err in Av tuma avoda zara as much as do Jews who convert to Xtianity and Islam.
LikeLike